LAW OF VICTORY?
What we ought to be looking at is whether there is a recipe for success in both war and peace that can be brought to light.
Q: What is the secret of success in combat, in an operation?
How is victory achieved?
Is there still that “magic key” which opens the “magic box of victory”?
Maybe everything is decided by the talent of the military leader?
Is the answer contained in the formula “the fittest wins”?
Is there a law of victory and if there is, what is it?
Basic formulation of a Law of Victory: The course and outcome of war is determined by the political goals and correlation of the aggregate forces of the warring sides, as well as by the ability of the latter to take into account the effects of the laws of war and warfare.
Analysis: law of victory incorporates a triad: formulation of a goal; creation of a corresponding troop grouping; and expert use of the available forces.
Law of victory incorporates an objective and subjective side
Objective: the goal and the correlation of forces is a permanent constituent of victory, reflecting the need to prepare in advance
Subjective: the essence of the law of victory (in a narrow sense). As a variable constituent of victory, it reflects that cognized freedom of action which is retained by military leaders ( commanders) of the opposing sides in the context of an abjective limitation of forces already in the course of war (operation or combat). Freedom is realized through the ability and skill to make an efficient use of their forces and fires, as well as other objective factors (time, space, terrain features, climactic and weather conditions, and so forth) which assume the form of “degrees of freedom” so that their effects favorable for the troops are strengthened and the unfavorable minimized. This is in fact military art - the art of using the laws of warfare in the interest of victory.
A characteristic of the law of victory is its certain logical transcendence as it incorporates all the laws of war and warfare. “ This means that the law of victory is impossible to represent in a manifest and unequivocal form: It is a “thing in itself”, as it were. This means that its cognition is inconceivable without studying the laws of warfare.
The problem is not to prove the dependence of the course and outcome of warfare on the knwoledge and creative use of its objective laws - this is obvious, but to elicit, in a concrete situation, those laws whose effect objectively contribute to victory, and, by making and executing corresponding decisions, use them actively - by engaging in “creative work” in the battlefield.